W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2013

Re: [css-containment] ED of Containment ready for review (was overflow:clip)

From: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 17:09:13 -0800
Message-ID: <CANMdWTv-GTazgi6eU=nyPu1PBaBc8D9t_gvdPhm9zzAnJKPHRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@chromium.org>, Levi Weintraub <leviw@chromium.org>, Charles Walton <charleswalton@google.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@google.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>  > I believe restrictions 2 and 3 should be dropped.
>>>>
>>>> Let's let some of the engineers that asked me for this restriction to
>>>> chime in first.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm OK with dropping it. As an overflow property, it would have been
>>> nice to be able to implement the clipping purely at paint time,
>>>
>>
>> What is the benefit of that?
>>
>
> The benefit is not large. It would just simplify our implementation some.
> As I said, I'm fine dropping it.
>
Received on Saturday, 7 December 2013 01:10:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:17 UTC