W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2012

Re: [css-variables] Resolving cyclical references in a better way (Issue 3)

From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 12:20:42 +0200
Message-ID: <9B7877B165814828BF0235857D7CADC2@FREMYD2>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: "CSS WG" <www-style@w3.org>
> From: Tab Atkins Jr. 
> I think you might misunderstand the spec's handling of this case.  The
> variables defined by cyclic custom properties are invalid, yes, but
> that triggers fallback values if they're provided.

If this is indeed what the spec intends, we can consider this issue solved.

> (Note - it would be helpful for you to link your proposal in the
> emails that reference it.  It sounds confusingly like you're saying
> something about a draft on dev.w3.org.)

I did in my original mail, not when I split it up. 
Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 10:21:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:03 UTC