Chris Nager <cnager@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi, Tab Atkins, Jr. > >I appreciate your feedback. Though the devices that use haptics are >rare, >there's nothing wrong with proposing possible properties and syntax on >how >we could take advantage of these future hardware features. Even if many >of >my proposed properties (like temperature) are not able to be used any >time >soon, the syntax is arguably future proof and allows for a certain >degree >of change. Thinking about what might be possible, and using that as feedback to companies developing haptic devices ("look what we could do if you changed your design just a little bit like this") can be valuable, but I think standardising it is premature, given the lack of certitude there will ever be a device capable of supporting it, let alone interested in doing so. FlorianReceived on Sunday, 21 October 2012 09:01:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:01 GMT