W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2012

Re: [css3-writing-modes] css-logical (was before/after terminology alternative?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:30:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDA13cn7fFKss5B9jeWjYixNKx=Geoysc8T1rAY4Pf3+ug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Cc: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>, MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "liam@w3.org" <liam@w3.org>, koba <koba@antenna.co.jp>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "public-i18n-cjk@w3.org" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
> Due to my own fault, I failed to object at the time the WG made that
> resolution. At this point, I will need to raise an FO unless it can be
> agreed to revert that earlier decision. Which is easier? Doing an FO process
> or reverting?

Given that you'll apparently object to Koji's suggested compromise as
well, it doesn't matter very much.

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2012 01:31:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:01 GMT