- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:15:15 -0500
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > A designer colleague just wrote `border-radius: none` (to override a less > specific declaration) and wasted some time trying to "make it work" before > figuring out that they needed `border-radius: 0`. > > Would it make sense to extend the border-radius property (and its longhands) > to accept the 'none' keyword that would compute to the same as '0' ? > > Cheers, > -- > Simon Sapin > I have often noted this myself and thought that there might be some sensible difference in a few cases - but I never was able to come up with one... I always find myself wanting to type "none" there (and in some other places too), especially since 0 is a "unitless" concept...
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2012 17:15:51 UTC