Agreed, Although remember that there is http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-text/#text-wrap0 which would affect how overflow-wrap is being used. I feel 'word-wrap' works nicely but agree with the issue with renaming widely deployed features. On 03/05/2012, at 2:17 PM, Simon Pieters wrote: > Hi > > (http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/ gives a server error for me.) > > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-text/#overflow-wrap0 > > Why is word-wrap renamed to overflow-wrap? The spec says UAs may support word-wrap also. This seems very silly. Please stick to word-wrap which is implemented in multiple browsers for years and is used by Web content. Renaming widely deployed features should not be done, even if the name is suboptimal. > > cheers > -- > Simon Pieters > Opera Software >Received on Sunday, 6 May 2012 05:25:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:53 GMT