- From: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 23:39:58 +0300
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 5/5/12 22:39, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > Yes, this does feel much cleaner and simpler. There already is content using > animation-direction though. True, backwards compatibility is a problem I mentioned myself as well. :( Ironic, given how there are only two shipped implementations (in stable builds) and even those are still behind a prefix… On the other hand, I’d argue there’s not *much* content using animation-direction. It would be great if we could somehow have stats about it. -- Lea Verou (http://lea.verou.me | @LeaVerou)
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2012 20:40:31 UTC