fantasai wrote: > I agree with your use case (and it's been on my mind the past few weeks > as well, after reading Alexander Shpack's messages), but I disagree with > your method. I think we should re-use the 'column-gap' property and add > a 'row-gap' property for the other dimension. (We'll need a 'row-gap' > property if we add a 'column-length' property as we've discussed anyway.) On, I like that quite a bit. Agreed! TedReceived on Wednesday, 28 March 2012 19:20:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 03:48:53 GMT