W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2012

Re: [css3-values] 5.1 minor clarification changes

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:20:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDD-B6yb5m8WRbOC-YdJ_VUkrVaHV96DpM-f3xBJeviZwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:
> 1. The normative definition of the ch unit makes sure the zero glyph is not
> read as a capital 'O'. But the informative summary table in 5.1 does not.
> The table definition should have the same parenthetical aside as the
> normative definition:
>
>  "0" (ZERO, U+0030) glyph
>
> 2. I'm not entirely sure this is correct, and if correct it may not be
> necessary. But I think the exception of relative lengths used with the
> font-size property could be made more clear with these changes within the
> scope of 5.1.1:
>
>  s/the font metrics/the computed font metrics/  (2 changes)
>  s/font size inherited/computed font size inherited/  (1 change)

I agree with all these.  They're committed now.

~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2012 19:21:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 03:48:51 GMT