W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2012

Re: [css3-writing-modes] available vs fill-available and multiple specs with definitions

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:23:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAjQT-dyGAhvzqDjqbJqtxZu8ZVZ18wZGqwtOUx=YLoZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>, www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm still confused. The dev version of Box has been updated more recently
> than even the Writing modes spec, and contains lots of descriptions and
> examples on how these width and height keywords work that seems to be
> missing from writing modes. It also defines the value "complex" that's
> missing from writing modes.
>
> Should I use fill-available or available? Should I be attempting to
> implement the complex keyword? :)

Ignore Box.  I have no idea when those keywords were added to it, but
they were at least 7 months ago, when the spec was migrated into
version control.  Writing Modes is more recent.

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 21:24:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:55 GMT