W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2012

Re: [css3-writing-modes] available vs fill-available and multiple specs with definitions

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:04:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAFkmYDPbBaB21Y2SWfXt+Yv7WiT=8b7s_ZrHGhA8_rmw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote:
> Le 13/06/2012 22:50, Elliott Sprehn a écrit :
>> The writing mode spec and box model spec differ on what this new keyword
>> is supposed to be called.
>>
>> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-writing-modes/ => fill-available
>> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-box/ => available
>>
>> Gecko currently implements -moz-available
>>
>> Which is correct?
>>
>> Also which spec should be considered as being more accurate for the
>> description of these new properties and how they interact?
>>
>
> css3-box is marked as "Dangerously outdated; see CSS2.1"
>
> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work
>
> It should have a big red Obsoletion Notice, like css3-content

At the time I was adding the obsoletion notices, Box was located
somewhere weird, not in the normal VC repo.  That's apparently
changed, so yeah, I should add the notice.

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 21:05:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:55 GMT