W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2012

Re: [css3-page] odd grammar for @page rules

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:04:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDC1+qk56g9OusSeRv-V2jFNE25jiYx-zEEfZc_C+sP8Cg@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:50 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 06/12/2012 05:55 AM, Simon Sapin wrote:
>> Also, Werner Donné pointed out that the 'page' production is not LL(k)
>> (with or without the above fix.) I don’t know if this
>> is a requirement. Discussion starts here:
>>
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0620.html
>
> Filed as ISSUE-263:
>  https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/263
>
> I'm not enough of a grammar person to know what to do with that issue,
> though.

There's nothing about the @page grammar that requires more than LL(1).
 I'll help fix it later.

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 01:05:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:55 GMT