W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2012

Re: [css3-exclusions] ordering exclusions by z-order

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 00:57:21 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLZpe9RYPFLoj0uKgfr6Zq=CUmfok1G_3ERzZNaAaC6Lew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>
Cc: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Rossen Atanassov <
Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rocallahan@gmail.com [mailto:rocallahan@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> > Robert O'Callahan
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 7:33 PM
> >
> > Examples in section 2:
> > The ‘wrap-flow’ property is used to make an element's generated box an
> > exclusion box.
> >
> > This language implicitly assumes there is one generated box per element.
> > Exclusion area
> The language specifies that this is true for the boxes generated by an
> element. I don't see a reason why this spec should be different than any
> other and define everything in terms of the obvious one-to-many relation
> between elements and boxes. Can you point me to a spec besides the CSS3
> Fragmentation (which is where all of this actually belongs) that we can use
> as an example?

Not off the top of my head.

How about saying something like "The ‘wrap-flow’ property makes each
border-box of an element an exclusion box."

“You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’
But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,
that you may be children of your Father in heaven. ... If you love those
who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors
doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more
than others?" [Matthew 5:43-47]
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 13:05:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:00 UTC