- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 22:51:07 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 9:22 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > http://www.jwz.org/blog/2012/07/non-bouncy-layouts/ describes a use > case that we should try to address; specifying an *intrinsic size* > for images that aren't loaded yet so that pages don't bounce around > when images load. This is doable today if you want the images to be > sized to their intrinsic size, but it's not doable today if you want > to scale the images but preserve the intrinsic ratio (for example, > by making them the width of their container). [snip] > Would it make sense to have an 'intrinsic-size' property? (If we > do, would we want it to override data from the image, or vice > versa?) Is there any use-case for providing just an intrinsic width or intrinsic height, rather than providing the pair? It seems like my proposal for an aspect-ratio property <http://www.xanthir.com/blog/b4810> would also solve this use-case, but more generally, right? ~TJ
Received on Sunday, 29 July 2012 05:51:55 UTC