On 07/25/2012 03:39 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote: > Now that both Webkit and Gecko have implementations of min-content, max-content, fill-available and fit-content for width (and > neither for height), I propose we unprefix the keywords for width. > > Note: Gecko unfortunately implemented an older spec as -moz-available instead of -moz-fill-available, so unprefixing should > also bring both Gecko and Webkit into alignment. > > Does anyone have any objections? Yes. The behavior of 'width' is that of the 'height' property in vertical writing modes, so until that's also implemented and interoperable, I don't think it's a good idea to remove the prefixes. In particular, behavior for 'fill-available' has been requested to change in the logical height dimension, and that's not even specced yet. Note that while Gecko doesn't implement vertical text, Webkit does. ~fantasaiReceived on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 23:12:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:57 GMT