W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2012

Re: [css3-flexbox] Painting order

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:29:25 -0400
Message-ID: <50097955.2050000@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 07/20/2012 06:26 AM, Anton Prowse wrote:
>
> In fact, the issue I was trying to address is a non-issue. I think the ED is fine as it is. Authors (and me!) will just have
> to learn that 'order' is more like z-index in that it represents grouping. It doesn't represent ordinal position even in
> minimal examples like the one you presented.

Yep. That's why when we were debating flex-order vs flex-index, I kept
arguing for flex-index. Because it works *exactly* like z-index. :)

~fantasai
Received on Friday, 20 July 2012 15:29:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:57 GMT