On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:12:15AM +1000, Peter Moulder wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012, Anton Prowse wrote: > > >D'oh! Thanks for pointing that out. I was aware of that in the > >past, but I certainly had forgotten that when working on Appendix E > >the other day. > > I'm sure; I know you've looked in detail at that appendix in the past, it's > just a matter of working without context on a little bit of that chapter. Put another way: I believe no CSSWG member has written more about Appendix E in the last five years than Anton Prowse. If this can trip up even him, then that's a strong argument for change even though it's just a wording change. pjrm.Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 01:00:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:56 GMT