- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:56:16 -0700
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
- Cc: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu> wrote: > At this point, I am actually more interested in knowing the 'order' of > the placeholder instead of saying again and again that I can't get the > answer from the prose. The truth is, I still don't know. > > Can someone tell me what 'order' does the placeholder in the above have? > Can I safely say it's '0' now? > > (Though I'd like to question if that's actually the behavior we want.) This is currently underdefined, because placeholders are underdefined. They'll be properly defined by either Box or Positioned Layout. The intention is that placeholders gain all the properties of the element except for 'position' and related properties, so that they can play the same role in layout as the positioned element would have. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 9 July 2012 16:57:04 UTC