W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2012

Re: [css3-images] Image Fragments and SVG URIs

From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 12:32:04 +0200
To: www-style@w3.org, www-svg@w3.org
Message-Id: <201207041232.05327.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
Lev Solntsev:

>> Obviously for a SVG document with the full profile one can as well
>> reference a view element with id='xywh' with a viewBox(40,0,20,20)
>> to be able to note this:
>> background-image: image('sprites.svg#xywh')
>Unfortunately, it doesn't work in that way in <img> tags or
>background-image:url() attribute in current implementations.
Well, implementations have lots of bugs and gaps, not just for CSS or SVG.
There are much more of those bugs and gaps in implementations than
bugs and gaps in recommendations ;o)
This is only an indication, that implementations need to be improved 
On the other hand - typically the 'bug probability' of documents
of authors is heigher than for implementations displaying such a document,
an indication as well, that the majority of content needs to be improved 
too ;o)

It does not necessarily improve the situation, to specify yet another method,
incompatible and less advanced than that, what is already recommended.

>Also it isn't clear, will the image be clipped by the corresponding
>viewport, for example if it is centered. I assume it shouldn't and that
>differs from “Image Fragments”.

This may depend on the overflow property, clipping and masking etc ...

Fortunately in SVG the author can decide what is intended.
Unfortunately the clip property is corrupted in CSS 2.1. SVG 1.1 still follows 
CSS2.0, but if viewers have a bug following CSS2.1, obviously they will fail
with clip, therefore better to use clipPath, clip-path etc.

Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2012 10:32:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 February 2015 12:35:12 UTC