Re: [css3-flexbox] Paint flex items atomically? from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2012-07-02 (www-style@w3.org from July 2012)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 12:51:34 -0700
To: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCExHO57rZ-M+p6-BjAH1_SC7Dg89Wzi3Ug2waPxD4itQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com> wrote:
> Should flex items be treated as if they sort of establish a new stacking
> context (except for descendants that are positioned or create true
> stacking contexts on their own)? I'm talking about what
> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/zindex.html has to say about inline-block,
> inline-table and floats.

There doesn't seem to be any particular reason to do so, and I don't
think existing implementations do so, so we're rejecting this request.

~TJ

Received on Monday, 2 July 2012 19:52:22 UTC