W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2012

Re: [css3-flexbox] flex-flow: wrap

From: Matthew Wilcox <elvendil@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:11:28 +0000
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <50F724E5-7049-4FA1-9112-7A4CFB75DB40@gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Having been bitten by the background-position problem more times than I care to count (you must respecify X and Y even if you only want to set one) I am all for breaking any proposed property into it's atomic parts at every opportunity. It simply makes sense in terms of consistency and flexibility.


On 20 Jan 2012, at 19:00, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:51 AM, fantasai
> <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>> On 12/06/2011 04:12 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>>> We should split wrapping out of flex-flow into a flex-wrap property.
>>> It made sense to combine them into flex-flow before when we had
>>> physical values, but now that we only have logical values, there's
>>> no benefit to since there are no invalid combinations.
>> 
>> Is there a use case for these two properties to cascade independently?
> 
> Dunno!  It seemed to make sense to separate them, because they are
> different things.
> 
> ~TJ
> 
Received on Friday, 20 January 2012 19:11:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:48 GMT