W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2012

Re: [css3-ui] editorial nits

From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:52:11 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOACb=JsiXqjByd+ui3fp=y936cCX4majBNcUdT5vUX3MsNPbQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 16:24, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:
>  # This section is normative.
>
> The feedback we got from fantasai on the css3-regions spec was to remove
> these sentences, as sections are presumed normative.

Removed.


>  Features at Risk
>
> There are eight features listed in this section, but only two
> (text-overflow:<string> and {1,2}) that have a note pointing out the risk in
> the relevant section. Should the other at-risk items have notes in their
> sections?

It helps set expectations and adds clarity, so yes. Good suggestion.


>  4.1.2 sentence fragment
>
> either
> /s/Typically/This typically/
> or
> /s/Typically/This selector typically/

Good catch.

Thanks for the suggested improvements.

Updated with your feedback and some feedback from fantasai on IRC:

http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-ui/

Thanks,

Tantek
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2012 06:53:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:48 GMT