W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2012

Re: aspect-ratio property

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:38:50 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCEcGxJpgb2dDkzq6JqJtiHgno82hRCrfdBgtVZQhxGmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: Hugh Guiney <hugh.guiney@gmail.com>, Matthew Wilcox <elvendil@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2012, at 1:25 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm not sure I agree this is the best thing. I think it would be better for
>>> fallback if we can author both width and height and have the height
>>> overridden by the aspect ratio.
>>
>> Hmm, that's an interesting point.  It may indeed be useful to do so.
>> I'll mark it in my blog post.
>
> Thanks. And by "height", I'm pretty sure I mean "block progression dimension".

Yes, I translated it to "extent dimension".


On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Hugh Guiney <hugh.guiney@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any chance of the video format note being added as well? Or do you feel
> there's still more to discuss regarding that?

Sorry, forgot about that.  Added now.

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 17:39:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:48 GMT