W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2012

Re: aspect-ratio property

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:13:19 -0800
Message-Id: <55D4F3A6-CCBD-4ADD-8166-72644E862C96@gmail.com>
Cc: Hugh Guiney <hugh.guiney@gmail.com>, Matthew Wilcox <elvendil@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>


On Jan 10, 2012, at 1:25 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure I agree this is the best thing. I think it would be better for
>> fallback if we can author both width and height and have the height
>> overridden by the aspect ratio.
> 
> Hmm, that's an interesting point.  It may indeed be useful to do so.
> I'll mark it in my blog post.

Thanks. And by "height", I'm pretty sure I mean "block progression dimension".
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 10:17:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:48 GMT