W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2012

Re: A CSS equivalent of HTML's DOCTYPE trigger

From: Juan Carlos Ojeda <juancarlospaco@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:25:56 -0300
Message-ID: <CALFJTa3Kq0wE1J257tcekF2-R8ebiaqjsQbQVQkB6ddjR1=cZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <elvendil@gmail.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org Style" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Matthew Wilcox <elvendil@gmail.com> wrote:

> HTML has a useful property whereby the DOCTYPE was hijacked to trigger
> standards compliant rendering modes.
>
> Some of CSS is sub-optimally implemented from a designer/typographer
> standpoint and there's not much tht can be done about it by us without
> breaking backward compatibility.
>
> Has thought been put into an equivalent strategy for CSS? For example,
> opting into which branch or module we'd like to work?
>
> I bring this up because I think the way typography is handled in CSS is
> simply fundamentally flawed from a typographers perspective, and
> un-resquable as is. If we could wind back the clock we could fix it, but we
> can't. How about we reset the clock? Allowing the author to choose which
> versions of the spec to adhere to?
>
> That would allow us to, for example, re-write the way that font's are used
> in CSS, without breaking backward compatibility. User Agents that don't
> understand the trigger would simply ignore it.
>
> Thoughts?
>

SVG got <DOCTYPE SVG>, i dunno CSS

-- 
.
Received on Monday, 9 January 2012 20:26:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:48 GMT