± From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] ± Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 1:58 PM ± ± On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: ± > For consistency with other shorthand properties, flex-flow should ± > accept an unordered list of values and should allow either the ± > flex-direction or flex-wrap value by itself. ± ± That seemed to be what Alex was asking for, too, so I'd put the question ± to the thread earlier. I was keeping it consistent with the old value ± until then. ± ± I've no problem with changing it, though. Fixed. I am not sure ordered was ever suggested, or maybe I missed that. I would do expect the shortcut property to take direction, wrap or both in any order - as most shortcut properties do. It seems we all agree on this, do we? AlexReceived on Thursday, 5 January 2012 22:12:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:48 GMT