W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [css3-flexbox] open issues in spec

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:59:12 -0800
Message-ID: <4F4E91A0.9000805@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 02/27/2012 08:32 PM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote:
>
>>> *Issue 4: *For consistency with '|white-space|', we should use
>>> '|nowrap|'. For consistency with '|text-wrap|', we should use 'none
>> <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#flex-flow-none>'. 'none
>> <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#flex-flow-none>'
>>> is the less dumb of these. Can we switch both this and '|text-wrap|' to '|no-
>> wrap|'
>>>
>>> == I like 'nowrap'. Change and resolve?
>>
>> I'd prefer to keep it consistent with text-wrap, so we should change both to
>> nowrap or have both as 'none'.
>
> 'none' looks weird in the shorthand 'flex-flow':
>
> 	flex-flow:row none;
>
> makes way less sense than
>
> 	flex-flow:row nowrap;

Fair point. :) I think that means we raise an issue against CSS3 Text.

> I don't hear strong preference either way, renaming to 'nowrap'. If

Not sure what you meant to say here...

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 20:59:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:51 GMT