- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:59:12 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 02/27/2012 08:32 PM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote: > >>> *Issue 4: *For consistency with '|white-space|', we should use >>> '|nowrap|'. For consistency with '|text-wrap|', we should use 'none >> <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#flex-flow-none>'. 'none >> <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#flex-flow-none>' >>> is the less dumb of these. Can we switch both this and '|text-wrap|' to '|no- >> wrap|' >>> >>> == I like 'nowrap'. Change and resolve? >> >> I'd prefer to keep it consistent with text-wrap, so we should change both to >> nowrap or have both as 'none'. > > 'none' looks weird in the shorthand 'flex-flow': > > flex-flow:row none; > > makes way less sense than > > flex-flow:row nowrap; Fair point. :) I think that means we raise an issue against CSS3 Text. > I don't hear strong preference either way, renaming to 'nowrap'. If Not sure what you meant to say here... ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 20:59:47 UTC