W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [css3-images] paint sources

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:59:18 +0100
Message-ID: <4F4C18D6.5020705@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: www-style@w3.org
Le 06/02/12 10:44, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :

> It's only a problem insofar as I should link specifically to the
> WHATWG spec.  Done.

Well, should we really? Please, this is not a religious war
but a serious question about the normative state of a document
that never stabilizes. Should the only version of "html" we
reference normatively be HTML WG's instead?

</Daniel>
Received on Monday, 27 February 2012 23:59:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:51 GMT