On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:22:41 +0100, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > I suspect the only value used is appearance: none;. David Baron mentioned > that implementations return random other things if it's not set to > 'none', > so we don't have interoperability on that. But maybe what we need is just > > appearance: auto | none This is exactly what we've been thinking; happy to see that you agree. - FlorianReceived on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 16:03:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:50 GMT