W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [css3-images] Editorial: Concrete object size resolution missing the gradient case

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:37:37 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCv89DFyrKF=y8R+xyW5T4H+a22+b=yJhbferQTZ4hCNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
Cc: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
<kennyluck@csail.mit.edu> wrote:
> 5.3. Default Concrete Object Size Resolution
>
> In a situation where the specified size missing and the object has no
> intrinsic dimensions (e.g. gradients), the flow of the algorithm seems
> to end in this branch:
>
>  # 2. If the concrete object size is still missing a width or height,
>  # and the object has an intrinsic aspect ratio, the missing
>  # dimension is calculated from the present dimension and the
>  # intrinsic aspect ratio. Otherwise, the missing dimension is
>  # taken from the default object size.
>
> Should the last sentence be
>
>  | Otherwise, each missing dimension is taken from the default
>  | object size.
>
> ?

That's definitely the intent, though I see how the sentence is worded
somewhat awkwardly.  I've changed it to your suggested text and logged
the issue.

~TJ
Received on Saturday, 11 February 2012 01:38:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:50 GMT