W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: prefixed values(RE: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions Paris F2F Monday Morning 2012-02-06: Administrivia, Vendor Prefixes, Property/Value Alias OM)

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:17:35 +0100
Message-ID: <4F3275EF.8040806@inkedblade.net>
To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
On 02/08/2012 10:49 AM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote:
>> From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 9:41 AM
>>
>>     RESOLVED: When a browser supports multiple syntaxes of a single property,
>>               they're treated as aliases in the cascade, such that last
>>               wins. In the OM, *all* variants show up, with equivalent
>>               values, regardless of which version was specified or which
>>               won.
>
> As Brian points out,
>
> 	The na´ve proposal forgets about, for example, prefixed *values*
> 	(such as gradient<image>).

The proposal described in that resolution is restricted to properties.
This was not unintentional.

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 13:20:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:50 GMT