W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [css3-transforms] Why do we need a 'perspective' property?

From: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 14:56:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKA+AxkN87f=NyFOu+PcCjhH-GO572xZKjiTk7yudwiqBdczBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
> [Please don't cc: people who are on www-style anyway]

[I don't know who's on www-style, and personally I prefer to be CCd
even if I'm on the list.  Is there an established convention here?]

> The point of the perspective property is to provide a common perspective
> for child elements (and, if you're in a 3d rendering context, for all members
> of that context). This is especially useful if the children have different x/y offsets
> due to normal CSS layout; they'll still share a common perspective origin.
>
> This avoids the need to have multiple transformed elements all specify
> perspective() in their transforms, with possibly different perspective origins.

Okay; so what's wrong with

  <div style="transform:perspective(1000px)">

instead of

  <div style="perspective:1000px">

?  Is it just that they work differently if you use transform-style:
flat?  That just makes me think transform-style: flat should go away
even more -- we could get rid of three out of the four properties that
3D transforms add.
Received on Monday, 6 February 2012 19:57:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:50 GMT