W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

RE: [css3-regions] issue: is first region initial containing block

From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 21:49:34 +0000
To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D51C9E849DDD0D4EA38C2E539856928412E39640@TK5EX14MBXC214.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15858

From: Alex Mogilevsky [mailto:alexmog@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 1:29 PM
To: Vincent Hardy; www-style@w3.org
Subject: [css3-regions] issue: is first region initial containing block

Discussion on stacking context morphed into a discussion on positioning in regions and in pages.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0136.html

Absolute positioning in fragmented flow in general should be defined outside regions spec (css3-fragmentation I would assume).

Whether or not first region is ICB for named flow content (and therefore positioned content is constrained to regions) or not - that deserves a separate decision, which to me seems related to stacking context decision.

I think we should have an issue for the spec and discuss it together with stacking.

My opinion: if stacking context for region is to be made optional (especially to allow matching stacking behavior of columns), constraining of positioning to regions will have to be optional for the same reason.
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2012 21:50:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:50 GMT