W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2012

Re: [CSSWG][selectors4] Updated WD of Selectors Level 4

From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:46:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CADC=+jd8a+53YCdO1yNA9NxSy0S1F=hyWH+Dq-R1rVnKWGzEag@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Aug 30, 2012 7:38 PM, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>
> The CSS WG has published an updated Working Draft of the Selectors Level
4:
>
>     http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors4/
>
> Selectors is a pattern-matching syntax for identifying sets of elements
in a document,
> and is used e.g. for applying CSS declarations to elements in a document
tree.
>
> Significant changes since the last Working Draft include:
>
>   * the subject indicator now uses ! instead of $
>       http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-selectors4-20120823/#subject
>   * a section was added on scoped selectors
>       http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-selectors4-20120823/#scoping
>   * the :lang() pseudo-class now accepts wildcard matches and language
lists
>       http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-selectors4-20120823/#the-lang-pseudo
>   * drag-and-drop pseudo-classes were added
>       http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-selectors4-20120823/#drag-pseudos
>       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0387.html
>   * a :user-error pseudo-class was added (for :-moz-ui-invalid)
>       http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-selectors4-20120823/#user-pseudos
>   * the :column() pseudo-class has been replaced with a combinator
>       http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-selectors4-20120823/#column-combinator
>
> Feedback is welcome, particularly on the changes.
>
> Please send any comments to this mailing list, <www-style@w3.org>,
preferably
> starting a new thread, and please, prefix the subject line with
>
>     [selectors4]
>
> (as I did on this message).
>
> For the CSS WG,
> ~fantasai
>
>
Since I got no response last time I will try again....
:has() ... please?  Reading the past minutes I do not see to be alone in my
support... it is honestly a lot less confusing and already proven.
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2012 23:47:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:59 GMT