On 8/28/12 3:37 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > This isn't hard. It is, however, inelegant and *useless*. There is > absolutely no reason to allow this, and it would simplify parsers the > spec and parsers to disallow it. Actually, it would make the Gecko parser more complicated, because there would have to be a special "get the next token even if it's a comment" tokenizer mode or something. Right now getting the next token can always skip over comments, which it wouldn't be able to do with your proposed change. So I don't think this is simpler for parsers, in general. It might be simpler for _your_ particular idea of a parser, perhaps. -BorisReceived on Tuesday, 28 August 2012 21:00:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:59 GMT