- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:03:38 -0700
- To: Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> wrote: > Any definition of pt that does not fall in the vicinity of 0.35 to 0.38 > physical mm is nuts. It does fall in the vicinity. The degree to which it falls close depends on several implementation choices, but it's close, and it converges to a "true" pt in the limit of infinite resolution. Anyway, this discussion has been had *multiple* times. There is nothing new to say; you're kvetching into the wind here. I'm dropping out. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 20 August 2012 19:04:25 UTC