W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2012

Re: [css3-conditional] navigator.supportsCSS rather than window.supportsCSS

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:27:14 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCRFnirCGrWUx3L83wAPrA3NA+LEt8Xos5Z4e3aGJDDEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So, based on the discussions on this thread, what does the group feel
>> about defining a new global named "CSS", which we use to hang new
>> css-related things off of that may not be worth polluting the global
>> object with (or that would require a cumbersome name if they were put
>> on the global).
>>
>
> I don't like this idea. There's nothing like this in the platform yet, and
> the difference between CSS.PixelValue and CSSPixelValue is one letter.

That's not what I suggested.  With a safe global that can't be
author-polluted, we can do *significantly* smaller names without
risking collisions.  I keep mentioning "CSS.px" as the name we'd
probably end up with for these kinds of things, which is significantly
better.

> Either way, supports() really needs to be a document level feature anyway
> because browsers support different CSS properties in standards vs quirks
> mode (IE...), or even in extensions or apps vs web pages (ex -moz-binding).

Standards vs quirks doesn't change the recognized properties, does it?
 I wasn't aware of that being a quirks-mode difference.

Do extensions get their own script global, separate from the web page?
 If not, I know they at least get some special objects for their
special capabilities.  We can give them a special version of this if
we want to let them recognize their special properties.

> document.supportsCSS(property, value) is what you want.

It's really not. :/

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 18:28:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:58 GMT