W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2012

Re: [selectors4] drag-and-drop pseudo-classes

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:06:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDA66=K=NDS+Mmw2g0HHkANR4ab041DgkW33qVo-TpnkFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Sebastian Zartner
<sebastianzartner@gmail.com> wrote:
>>   * One for all elements representing possible drop targets
>>     that could receive the item.
>>   * One for all elements representing drop targets that do
>>     not accept this type of item.
> This sounds like these two pseudo-classes would do exactly the opposite. So
> why not use :not() for this case?

Nope, the distinction is similar to :valid/:invalid - usually, most
elements will match neither, because they're not drop targets at all,
so they can't be a valid drop target *or* an invalid one.

Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2012 18:07:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:02 UTC