W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2012

Re: [css4-images] element() syntax (was: First draft of css4-images, feedback requested)

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:44:21 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLZYRxEuhgTC9PvAZDo1s5bsVG82B6o25Su=djn3a4OB=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote:

> I'm inclined to follow whatever the spec ends up doing for transforms
> on the element.  Right now, it ignores them, so I prefer ignoring
> clipping on the element or its ancestors.

That makes some sense for 'clip' and 'clip-path', which clip everything
including borders, but less sense for  'overflow'. For example, if you
"ignore clipping on the element" for 'overflow:scroll', then the children
of the element will spill over its borders and scrollbars, which would be

“You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’
But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,
that you may be children of your Father in heaven. ... If you love those
who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors
doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more
than others?" [Matthew 5:43-47]
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2012 00:44:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:02 UTC