On Aug 7, 2012, at 12:42 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: >> I think ¡°background¡± has been (ab)used enough. >> >> If the feature is important, make it part of image() not background. > > Definitely agree, though if I explored this in more detail, I'd do it > with an @image at-rule that was basically creating a simplified form > of SVG filters/etc in CSS. That sounds like it'd be harder to animate.Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2012 06:44:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:58 GMT