W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2012

RE: [css3-flexbox] One final round of bikeshedding on property/value names?

From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 02:44:23 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2C86A15F63CD734EB1D846A0BA4E0FC80E77EA29@CH1PRD0310MB381.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
± From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] 
± Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 4:34 PM
± 
± 'flex-align' becomes 'content-align'
± 'flex-item-align' becomes 'box-align'
± 'flex-line-pack' becomes 'content-pack'
± 'flex-pack' becomes 'content-justify'

I am not a fan of moving to generic properties, I can't say I am perfectly happy with current naming. 'flex-item-align' and 'flex-line-pack' aren't the best names I've seen. 

Do we have better ideas, or can we apply Fanatai's thinking within the "flex-" set?


Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 02:45:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:52 GMT