- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 02:39:12 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
± From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] ± Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 12:52 PM ± ± Rename flex-order ± =============== ± ± fantasai recommends changing flex-order to box-order, for the ± same reasons as the alignment properties - this property is ± potentially usable by other layout modes, and if they do, it ± would be nice to have a more generic name. ± ± 'box-order' matches the naming convention fantasai established ± in her suggestion for renaming the alignment properties. As with other renames, this will make sense when there is a specification that defines the generic property across all its intended use. I am really not comfortable with speculative rename, while we didn’t yet have a serious conversation about ever having that applicable to blocks, lists or tables.
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 02:40:14 UTC