W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2012

Re: [css3-fonts] Addition of font-size: xxx-large

From: Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:54:17 -0400
Message-ID: <4F8DCA69.2000301@earthlink.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 2012/04/18 03:32 (GMT+0800) Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu composed:

> It seems that this discussion would benefit greatly from opinions of
> those who participated in the previous discussion that led to the
> current mapping. I am not one of such people but I think if we add
> 'xxx-large', we should probably add 'xxx-small' for consistency.

In most environments, 9px is the smallest size legible across entire charsets.

In most environments, xx-small maps to 9px.

HTML <font> never had anything that would map to xxx-small.

Adding xxx-small would do nothing useful.
-- 
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)

  Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2012 19:54:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:52 GMT