W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2012

Re: nav-* properties

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:41:39 -0600
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+cRu_Dkhv8Bwd9jHGFgDDQ_tSaDcoKFeDfebwfSnEivhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
Cc: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
thanks (and forwarding)

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> wrote:

> (note: ok with posting this on www-style, if that's ok with you, i'd
> like to forward my reply to www-style. thanks, -t)
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 15:00, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
> > I see that the current CSS UI LCWD marks nav-* as at risk. Is this
> because
> > there aren't two implementations?
>
> Yes. There might not even be one (that satisfies what the CSSWG
> considers an implementation - that is, I'm not sure Opera supports
> nav-* on the desktop).
>
> > Is there any movement towards satisfying
> > this?
>
> None that I know of. There seems to be a lack of implementer interest.
>
> > Is there a recommended alternative approach if they will be dropped?
>
> They'll be added to the list of dropped CSS3-UI features being
> considered for CSS4-UI:
>
> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css4-ui#dropped-css3-features
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tantek
>
> --
> http://tantek.com/ - I made an HTML5 tutorial! http://tantek.com/html5
>
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 22:42:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:52 GMT