- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:41:57 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:15 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > I think it would be better for the transitions spec to define the > animation rules for all properties ahead of it (i.e., everything in > 2.1 or in css3 drafts ahead of it) and we should add "Animatable:" > lines to the property template for everything behind or roughly even > with transitions. > > The "Animatable" line should link to *how* the property is > animatable, so the definitions in the transitions spec should be > easy to link to, but some modules will give their own definitions as > well. (In other words, it should probably say things like "no", "as > <a>integer</a>", "as <a>shadow</a>", etc.) Took the words out of my mouth. I was writing a message to suggest exactly this before lunch, and now I don't need to send it. Dean, if you or one of your editors doesn't have time, I'm willing to make the edit. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2011 20:42:45 UTC