Re: [cssN backgrounds] background-repeat: extend;

* L. David Baron wrote:
>So if you're going to have long threads discussing proposals, could
>you please write the proposal down first so that other people can
>have a minimal chance of following?  (I'm pretty close to giving up
>on trying to follow www-style because of the volume.)

(Well http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Aug/0029.html I
have a bit of a problem with the priorities, and I have a problem with
the breadth of the discussions, but volume does not factor into it much;
and I disagree that having people flesh out proposals for specification
text would help (I would expect quite the opposite; I assume of course
that you mean proposals in this sense, as this appears to have been an
issue of terminology, and rigorous attention to terminilogy is what I
would associate with specification text). In the case here though, the
first mail in the thread was "Is there a draft that discusses this? I
couldn't find one." Even if you add the "background-repeat: extend" in
the Subject, this does not establish context well enough for anyone to
follow, so downstream confusion and inattention is to be expected.)
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2011 23:43:59 UTC