W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2011

Re: [css] Proposal: making Shorthand Hex Colors even shorter (16 grayscale shades)

From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:39:36 +1000
Message-ID: <4E66E778.1000408@css-class.com>
To: Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>
CC: Marat Tanalin <mtanalin@yandex.ru>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
On 7/09/2011 12:54 PM, Shane Stephens wrote:
>>
>>
>> RGB components are represented by 256 values precisely because of
>> representational issues - that is, each component is represented by a single
>> byte.
>>
>
> Woah. That's a horrible sentence. I blame the fact that I'm sick...


Can relate somewhat.


>  Let me try again:
>
> There's no reason in color theory why RGB components should be confined to
> 256 values. They're this way because the underlying representation is a
> byte; which as it turns out is the same as the underlying representation of
> the alpha component.
>
> Cheers,
>      -Shane


I think the reason we have 256 colors per channel is that when tuples of 
this can generate 16,777,216 colors, it goes way over the 6 millions 
colors that human can differentiate and a larger share of these 6 
million color are outside the sRGB gamut. Anyway the logical expansion 
would be #RRRGGGBBB and 4,096 colors per channel is just insane.



-- 
Alan Gresley
http://css-3d.org/
http://css-class.com/
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2011 03:39:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:44 GMT