- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:27:46 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't see how. I am giving 'linear-gradient()' equal standing to 'url()'. CSS does not include ways for BMP/JPG/PNG images to be cropped, moved, and sized within 'url()', So why does radial-gradient have to have ghat? Linear gradients have the advantage that, no matter what size and position you choose for the gradient-line, you can construct a gradient with identical appearance that has the gradient-line defined as the draft does (centered in the box, with endpoints placed in a particular way). Radials don't have that. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 21:28:34 UTC