- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:07:35 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 01:05:07 +0900, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> So that would be the note, then. Anne, could you make it not a note? > > Shouldn't the other specifications make the extension requirements? I think it's easier and more comprehensible to just have CSSOM define the wiki page as being the normative definition of the components. > If not, how should the note be rephrased to make a normative > requirement? Similar to how HTML makes the rel wiki normative, I would imagine. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 20:08:22 UTC