- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:56:44 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
[Tab Atkins Jr.:] > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > [Anne van Kesteren:] > >> I could update the note I just added saying it is for coordination > >> between vendors and specifications, then remove the extensibility > >> section from the specification, and leave the specific details up to > >> the wiki page in question. > >> > >> We could then add a new section to the wiki page where we document > >> extensions from vendors. > >> > >> Does that work for everyone? > >> > > Sure, this *can* work. But is something that's required to ensure > > interop be a note linking to a wiki page ? > > Do you have a problem with the note, or the wiki page? > I care about implementation requirements being normative.
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 15:57:21 UTC