W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2011

RE: [cssom] CSSRule extensibility

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:56:44 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3C4041FF83E1E04A986B6DC50F01782938BD56@TK5EX14MBXC297.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

[Tab Atkins Jr.:]
> 
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> > [Anne van Kesteren:]
> >> I could update the note I just added saying it is for coordination
> >> between vendors and specifications, then remove the extensibility
> >> section from the specification, and leave the specific details up to
> >> the wiki page in question.
> >>
> >> We could then add a new section to the wiki page where we document
> >> extensions from vendors.
> >>
> >> Does that work for everyone?
> >>
> > Sure, this *can* work. But is something that's required to ensure
> > interop be a note linking to a wiki page ?
> 
> Do you have a problem with the note, or the wiki page?
> 
I care about implementation requirements being normative.

Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 15:57:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:45 GMT